15:31:04 #startmeeting Pulp Triage 2018-01-23 15:31:04 !start 15:31:04 #info dalley has joined triage 15:31:04 Meeting started Tue Jan 23 15:31:04 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dalley. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:31:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:31:04 The meeting name has been set to 'pulp_triage_2018_01_23' 15:31:04 dalley: dalley has joined triage 15:31:19 !here 15:31:19 #info asmacdo has joined triage 15:31:19 asmacdo: asmacdo has joined triage 15:31:26 !here 15:31:26 #info misa has joined triage 15:31:26 misa: misa has joined triage 15:31:29 !here 15:31:29 #info ttereshc has joined triage 15:31:29 ttereshc: ttereshc has joined triage 15:31:42 !next 15:31:42 !here 15:31:43 dalley: 3 issues left to triage: 3307, 3308, 3310 15:31:43 #topic import_upload: unit_key can no longer be None - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3307 15:31:43 #info preethi has joined triage 15:31:44 Issue #3307 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 15:31:45 import_upload: unit_key can no longer be None - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3307 15:31:46 preethi: preethi has joined triage 15:32:04 !here 15:32:04 #info jortel has joined triage 15:32:04 jortel: jortel has joined triage 15:32:23 ttereshc, Replied to https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3310#note-4 15:32:37 !here 15:32:37 #info ipanova has joined triage 15:32:37 ipanova: ipanova has joined triage 15:33:53 should we consider this a documentation fix? 15:34:16 i don't see any semver braking change, i think in out api docs we have this key as required key, so i do think it was a bug which was fixed and rolling it back to None is a bad idea imho 15:34:38 #info milan_ has joined triage 15:34:38 !here 15:34:38 milan_: milan_ has joined triage 15:35:07 agreed. the 2.15 fix is correct 15:35:27 I propose to move 3307 to core, and add validation 15:35:28 https://docs.pulpproject.org/dev-guide/integration/rest-api/content/upload.html?highlight=unit_key#import-into-a-repository 15:35:29 seems like a wontfix 15:35:40 no "*optional* for unit_key 15:36:03 ipanova: but unit_metadata is optional and will fail the same way 15:36:40 misa: let's move to core and rename the issue to " improve validation' 15:36:45 durinf upload 15:36:47 :) 15:37:39 That's what I was proposing, more or less 15:37:59 !propose other accept, move issue to core, rewrite to an improve validation issue 15:37:59 #idea Proposed for #3307: accept, move issue to core, rewrite to an improve validation issue 15:37:59 dalley: Proposed for #3307: accept, move issue to core, rewrite to an improve validation issue 15:38:01 improve validation and docs 15:38:10 ichimonji10, thanks 15:38:19 _1 15:38:22 +1 15:38:38 ttereshc, Thank you. 15:38:48 who will edit the issue? 15:39:18 misa: :-P? 15:39:27 I can, but I don't know if I can move it 15:39:40 misa, you won't have to, I can 15:40:13 done 15:40:27 !accept 15:40:27 #agreed accept, move issue to core, rewrite to an improve validation issue 15:40:27 dalley: Current proposal accepted: accept, move issue to core, rewrite to an improve validation issue 15:40:29 dalley: 2 issues left to triage: 3308, 3310 15:40:29 #topic Sync of unchanged importer update repo version - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3308 15:40:31 Issue #3308 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 15:40:32 Sync of unchanged importer update repo version - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3308 15:40:35 misa: ++ 15:40:35 ipanova: misa: 's karma is now 1 15:40:45 misa++ 15:40:45 dalley: misa's karma is now 6 15:40:56 ipanova: see, you need to check your inputs :-P 15:41:45 misa: i don't argue on that 15:41:48 this sounds like correct behavior to me kersom 15:42:38 I was expecting the version of repo to be kept the same, and latest_sync date to be changed. 15:43:01 since nothing has changed, why change the repo version. 15:43:40 it actually creates a new repo version 15:43:44 +1 to correct behavior 15:43:59 I am not familiar with this functionality yet, and I talked with bizhang, I understood that she should like to discuss this behavior. 15:44:14 asmacdo, I guess we have it somewhere described as a part of the design, do you recall where? 15:44:15 IIRC, this is how it was designed. 15:44:35 i dont know if that decision is documented 15:44:42 kersom, but if you disagree with the design .. start a discussion on pulp-dev? 15:44:55 I tried yesterday 15:45:12 I was trying to understand first of all 15:45:22 ah yeah, kersom asked me but I wasn't sure if it was the correct behavior 15:45:22 let's leave a comment on issue with explanation and skip until next triage 15:45:28 in case there would be more questions 15:45:37 ok, hows this, lets skip for now, ill comment on the issue and close. kersom if you disagree, feel free to reopen 15:45:58 works for me 15:46:11 if we guys decide like that, I am ok with, I just dont see the benefit of doing this, but probably I do not know the reasoning 15:46:21 we almost did it the way kersom expects, but there was a problem with asynchronous tasks, ill explain 15:47:18 !propose triage other asmacdo will close and comment with a description of the reasoning 15:47:18 dalley: (propose triage [target_release]) -- Propose triage values including priority, severity, and an optional target release. 15:47:34 !propose other asmacdo will close and comment with a description of the reasoning 15:47:34 #idea Proposed for #3308: asmacdo will close and comment with a description of the reasoning 15:47:34 dalley: Proposed for #3308: asmacdo will close and comment with a description of the reasoning 15:47:39 +1 15:47:55 +1 15:48:02 +1 15:48:15 !accept 15:48:15 #agreed asmacdo will close and comment with a description of the reasoning 15:48:15 dalley: Current proposal accepted: asmacdo will close and comment with a description of the reasoning 15:48:17 #topic Pulp can't sync from some mirrorlists - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3310 15:48:17 dalley: 1 issues left to triage: 3310 15:48:19 Issue #3310 [POST] (ttereshc) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 15:48:20 Pulp can't sync from some mirrorlists - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3310 15:48:24 !propose accept 15:48:24 #idea Proposed for #3310: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 15:48:24 ttereshc: Proposed for #3310: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 15:48:34 that's my bad from yestrday 15:48:38 it's already assigned, should we add to sprint? 15:48:44 it's in post 15:48:47 and on the sprint 15:48:54 it blocks 2.15.1 15:49:19 ah, it's changed since I loaded the page 15:49:23 +1 accept 15:49:24 +1 15:49:39 !accept 15:49:39 #agreed Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 15:49:39 dalley: Current proposal accepted: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 15:49:40 dalley: No issues to triage. 15:49:44 !end 15:49:44 #endmeeting