16:05:40 <dkliban> #startmeeting Pulp Triage 2020-09-18 3.7.0 check-in meeting 16:05:40 <dkliban> #info dkliban has joined triage 16:05:40 <dkliban> !start 3.7.0 check-in meeting 16:05:40 <pulpbot> Meeting started Fri Sep 18 16:05:40 2020 UTC. The chair is dkliban. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:05:40 <pulpbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 16:05:40 <pulpbot> The meeting name has been set to 'pulp_triage_2020-09-18_3.7.0_check-in_meeting' 16:05:40 <pulpbot> dkliban: dkliban has joined triage 16:05:50 <daviddavis> #info daviddavis has joined triage 16:05:50 <daviddavis> !here 16:05:50 <pulpbot> daviddavis: daviddavis has joined triage 16:06:03 <daviddavis> anyone got a link to the 3.7.0 milestone handy 16:06:15 <ttereshc> #info ttereshc has joined triage 16:06:15 <ttereshc> !here 16:06:16 <pulpbot> ttereshc: ttereshc has joined triage 16:06:32 <x9c4> #info x9c4 has joined triage 16:06:32 <x9c4> !here 16:06:32 <pulpbot> x9c4: x9c4 has joined triage 16:06:39 <bmbouter> #info bmbouter has joined triage 16:06:39 <bmbouter> !here 16:06:40 <pulpbot> bmbouter: bmbouter has joined triage 16:07:12 <bmbouter> ok so here's the current query: https://tinyurl.com/y6rqlufb 16:07:51 <dkliban> we have 2 items at POST, 3 at ASSIGNED, and 1 at NEW 16:08:14 <daviddavis> the one at new we're discussing monday 16:08:15 <ttereshc> the new one is for Monday 16:08:19 <bmbouter> yup 16:08:23 <dkliban> cool 16:08:29 <bmbouter> and it will be easy to PR it then (it'll be small) 16:08:31 <daviddavis> 7487 should have a pr opened today 16:08:48 <bmbouter> 7471 I'll have a PR opened today 16:09:01 <daviddavis> 7411? 16:09:18 * daviddavis eyes dkliban 16:09:38 <dkliban> yes 16:10:01 <dkliban> i will be out the rest of this afternoon but i plan on working on that issue on monday 16:10:29 <bmbouter> we really need this for the dev cycle of 3.7 - 3.8 so it shouldn't formally block the release 16:10:32 <bmbouter> aka I think that is a fine timeline 16:10:32 <dkliban> i expect to have a PR for the plugin template and pulp_file on Monday 16:10:46 <daviddavis> sounds good to me 16:10:51 <bmbouter> it's really designed to test the upcoming plugin releases against 3.8.0.dev 16:11:13 <bmbouter> I'm fixing up 7413 now and will merge (with its lgtms on it) after my next push 16:11:18 <daviddavis> cool 16:11:26 <daviddavis> what about 6463 ? 16:11:37 <bmbouter> based on lots of PR discussion I don't believe there will be a pulpcore PR for it 16:11:43 <bmbouter> and the fix will occur in pulp_rpm only 16:11:48 <bmbouter> dalley: ^ ? 16:11:48 <daviddavis> ok 16:11:58 <bmbouter> dalley: let us know if this is not the case 16:12:17 <dalley> bmbouter, no, regardless of which strategy is used to fix it both PRs are necessar 16:12:37 <dalley> actually it's the RPM PR that is necessary only because the code was duplicated both places 16:12:58 <daviddavis> so no pulpcore pr then? 16:13:12 <dalley> yes pulpcore PR :) 16:13:18 <daviddavis> oh 16:13:34 <daviddavis> what's the timeline. do you think you cna get it merged by monday? 16:13:40 <bmbouter> or today? 16:13:52 <dalley> today is what I was aiming for 16:14:23 <bmbouter> I think if that and the other things discussed earlier to happen today happen, we'll be sitting pretty for the release on tuesday 16:14:59 <bmbouter> should we remove 7411 from the 3.7.0 milestone? since it's not blocking 16:15:01 <daviddavis> great 16:15:05 <daviddavis> yea 16:15:08 * bmbouter does it now 16:15:27 <bmbouter> done 16:15:34 <daviddavis> also, if someone has time to review a docs PR, I have one I'd like to get in https://github.com/pulp/pulp_file/pull/428 16:15:55 <bmbouter> yup can do 16:16:00 <bmbouter> and anyone else too ^ 16:16:43 <ttereshc> it's the one :) the one that caught bugs 16:17:18 <bmbouter> truth but docs don't have to happen later 16:17:58 <bmbouter> can we hear an all-around for go/no-go on the 22nd release? 16:18:14 <bmbouter> I am a 'go' 16:18:17 <daviddavis> go 16:18:19 <dkliban> go 16:18:30 <x9c4> go! 16:18:35 <ttereshc> I'm go wtih a hoe that 3.8 can be planned better 16:18:39 <ttereshc> *hope 16:19:14 <x9c4> Should we create a 3.8.0 milestone right away? 16:19:19 <bmbouter> yes we should 16:19:22 <dkliban> yes 16:20:04 <bmbouter> call me crazy but we've deliver huge features folks told us about at the last minute (fips and selinux) and even a few days ahead, I'm not sure what better looks like 16:20:46 <bmbouter> I'm interested to hear what we want we didn't get in the 3.7 process 16:23:16 <dkliban> let's discuss next week 16:23:24 <dkliban> i don't have an answer for you 16:23:32 <dkliban> but i want to end this meeting 16:23:58 <bmbouter> to hear folks aren't happy w/ the release I led but without details is a little unsettling 16:24:08 <dkliban> ttereshc: ^ 16:24:19 <bmbouter> but yes let's end the go/no go part at least 16:24:34 <bmbouter> I hear go's all around, I'll send out an update w/ that to pulp-dev on thread 16:24:37 <dkliban> #endmeeting 16:24:37 <dkliban> !end