14:00:02 <dalley> #startmeeting Pulp Triage 2021-05-07 14:00:02 <dalley> !start 14:00:02 <dalley> #info dalley has joined triage 14:00:02 <pulpbot> Meeting started Fri May 7 14:00:02 2021 UTC. The chair is dalley. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:02 <pulpbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:02 <pulpbot> The meeting name has been set to 'pulp_triage_2021-05-07' 14:00:02 <pulpbot> dalley: dalley has joined triage 14:00:10 <ggainey> #info ggainey has joined triage 14:00:10 <ggainey> !here 14:00:10 <pulpbot> ggainey: ggainey has joined triage 14:00:14 <dalley> 2.13.0 roadmap: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/issues?fixed_version_id=188&set_filter=1&status_id=* 14:00:37 <daviddavis> #info daviddavis has joined triage 14:00:37 <daviddavis> !here 14:00:37 <pulpbot> daviddavis: daviddavis has joined triage 14:01:09 <ggainey> ^2.13^3.13 14:01:44 <dalley> ..yeah 14:01:47 <ggainey> :) 14:02:04 <ipanova> #info ipanova has joined triage 14:02:04 <ipanova> !here 14:02:04 <pulpbot> ipanova: ipanova has joined triage 14:02:16 <daviddavis> hey so I'd like to remove https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8192 from 3.13. I'm hoping to get it in but it might not be done by the 12th. also, ansible doesn't need it until july-ish. 14:02:21 <x9c4> #info x9c4 has joined triage 14:02:21 <x9c4> !here 14:02:21 <pulpbot> x9c4: x9c4 has joined triage 14:02:27 <daviddavis> I don't think it needs to block 3.13 14:02:52 <daviddavis> any objections? 14:02:52 <ggainey> works for me 14:03:08 <dalley> as long as ansible is the only stakeholder, sure 14:03:19 <bmbouter> #info bmbouter has joined triage 14:03:19 <bmbouter> !here 14:03:19 <pulpbot> bmbouter: bmbouter has joined triage 14:03:28 <ipanova> no objections 14:03:35 <ggainey> I mean, everybody is going to *want* this - but I don't think anybody else has a hard deadline for it 14:03:38 <bmbouter> works for me 14:03:41 <bmbouter> agreed 14:03:48 <dalley> +1 14:03:52 <ipanova> we don't have resolution on this ticket https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8656 14:04:01 <ipanova> bmbouter: did you hear more from ansible folks? 14:04:23 <bmbouter> I do, I mean we can go ahead and fix it, but I don't think it needs to block since they haven't followed up 14:04:45 <ipanova> ok 14:05:23 <daviddavis> +1 14:05:37 <bmbouter> so keep these on 3.13 and just bump out at the end, or move to 3.14? 14:06:08 <ipanova> let's bump out at the end 14:06:14 <ggainey> +1 14:06:16 <dalley> +1 14:06:36 <bmbouter> +1 14:06:38 <daviddavis> I think https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8691 needs to block the release, yea? 14:06:48 <dalley> definitely 14:06:54 <ipanova> yep 14:06:55 <ggainey> yes 14:07:10 <x9c4> absolutely 14:07:21 <daviddavis> I would like to get https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8386 into 3.13. there's a PR open for it that needs review. 14:07:36 <dalley> there was some discussion about this at the RPM meeting 14:07:44 <bmbouter> yes I agree 14:07:45 <dalley> we maybe have a concern 14:07:48 <bmbouter> I can review that today 14:07:59 <daviddavis> dalley: ooo ok 14:08:31 <ipanova> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7316 this has been moved for multiple releases, should we take it of 3.13? 14:08:42 <dalley> TL;DR the RPM plugin needs to have a new release that supports static_context in modules, and this release really needs to be satellite-compatible as a CYA concern 14:09:15 <dalley> we're discussing even backing out the auto-publish changes just to do this new release and adding them back after 14:09:26 <daviddavis> interesting, ok 14:09:30 <bmbouter> yup interesting. makes sense, I'm ok with moving BaseDistribution removal to 3.14 14:09:40 <daviddavis> me too 14:09:50 <ggainey> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8638 is the pulp-rpm issue, fwiw 14:10:06 <daviddavis> ok, keep me updated 14:10:12 <dalley> great! and just to be clear, it is not 100% clear at this point that it will be necessary 14:10:18 <daviddavis> +1 14:10:53 <dalley> but Tanya suggested perhaps we could push the pulpcore release a few days to learn whether it will or will not be 14:11:03 <ggainey> dalley: I'm *hoping* to have PRs for 8638 today, testing publish/distribute now 14:11:06 <ggainey> yeah 14:11:41 <dalley> we can probably discuss again next week, especially if there's any items left over 14:11:44 <ipanova> my preference would be to push the release if possible 14:12:07 <ggainey> do we want to reconvene M or Tu and make a call then? 14:12:13 <ipanova> a few days* 14:12:16 <dalley> I think we probably should 14:12:22 <daviddavis> +1 14:12:37 <ipanova> +1 Tue 14:12:38 <bmbouter> +1 14:12:39 <dalley> tuesday, since not much will happen before monday, and the morning is packed already 14:12:44 <ipanova> yep 14:12:46 <ggainey> fair enough 14:13:00 <daviddavis> +1 14:13:18 <ipanova> so what is the outcome, are we go or we push back a few days? 14:13:40 <dalley> discuss on Tuesday 14:13:54 <ipanova> alright 14:14:06 <ggainey> +1 14:14:12 <dalley> but we're OK with pushing back the whole removal if we need to * 14:14:48 <ggainey> that's what I'm hearing, aye 14:15:53 <dalley> how about https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7316 14:17:03 <bmbouter> not a blocker again I believe 14:17:08 <daviddavis> we really need to fix it though 14:17:16 <bmbouter> agreed 14:17:30 <bmbouter> I wouldn't mind taking this on after the django work 14:17:33 <ggainey> yus 14:17:41 <ggainey> bmbouter++ 14:17:41 <pulpbot> ggainey: bmbouter's karma is now 356 14:17:42 <bmbouter> I've been all up in the storage analysis recently 14:17:46 <ggainey> heh 14:17:59 <bmbouter> I can report on what I find at the next meeting so leave it on for now? 14:18:09 <ipanova> works for me 14:18:11 <ggainey> +1 14:18:19 <dalley> +1 14:18:23 <x9c4> +1 14:18:47 <daviddavis> +1 14:18:55 <dalley> anything else? should we maybe look at the sprint and see if anything *should* be on the list? 14:20:20 <x9c4> bmbouter, and i just discussed that we want to add a new worker entry point as preparation for the tasking system switch, there i no ticket yet. 14:20:36 <ipanova> i think if would be that important it would be targeted for 3.13 already 14:21:39 <dalley> looking through the list, I think I agree 14:21:46 <daviddavis> ggainey: is this still targeted for 3.13? https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8146 14:21:50 <ggainey> dalley: skimming the sprint-96 list, I don't see anything I would block 3.13 for that isn't already on the list 14:22:20 <bmbouter> yeah I agree re the sprint review 14:22:27 <dalley> #endmeeting 14:22:27 <dalley> !end